My dearest Mermaid Darlings, and my cherished Stillwater Petticoat Society,
There is a question I am asked with such regular cheerfulness that I have come to anticipate it before it is even spoken, and it is this: “Do you do reenactments?” — as though I might at any moment unpin my collar, slip from my petticoat, and reveal a modern creature concealed beneath the muslin.
I always smile, for I know no harm is meant, and yet I answer swiftly, almost protectively, “No, my love — I simply live this way,” and in that gentle correction there is more tenderness than defensiveness, for what I am safeguarding is not an outfit but an orientation of the soul.
I have dressed thus since my youth, long before hashtags gathered around the word cottage like bees to clover, long before slow living was packaged into square frames and sold back to women as salvation, long before linen aprons became profitable and enamel basins photogenic; I wore the skirts when it was peculiar, when it invited curious glances in grocery aisles, when no applause accompanied it and no algorithm carried it further than the hedgerow of my own little life.
And so, if I am to be entirely honest with you — and I should like to be — I have found myself, at times, unsettled by the manner in which certain aesthetics are donned and then quietly set aside when the season turns, for it is not the painting of nails nor the dining in cheerful establishments nor the seeking of modern comforts that stirs my spirit into disquiet, but rather the sensation that what is presented and what is lived do not always walk hand in hand.
I have observed, with no small measure of introspection, that what troubles me is not indulgence but incongruence, not modernity but misalignment, for when an image of rustic self-sufficiency is curated whilst another’s hands and the chickens tend the garden are cared for by an elder relative whose labour goes unnamed, something in my nervous system registers a soft fracture, as though the spell were cast in one breath and broken in the next.
And perhaps the truest confession is this: I have paid for this life in courage.
I wore the dresses before they were admired.
I chose slowness before it was admired.
I lived quietly before quiet became enviable.
There is a human reflex, is there not, that winces ever so slightly when others are applauded for what one has carried privately for decades, and I would be disingenuous were I to pretend that such a thought has never brushed against my heart like a cool draft beneath a door.
Yet I do not write this from superiority, nor from bitterness, nor from a desire to indict anyone for experimentation, for many souls are simply trying on identities in the way one tries on bonnets before discovering which shade best suits her complexion, and there is no wickedness in searching; what I am describing is something subtler — a devotion to coherence.
It is coherence that I revere.
It is continuity that I find beautiful.
When I think of Tasha Tudor — whose name has become nearly synonymous with storybook domesticity — I do not think first of her pinafores, nor her goats, nor her Vermont garden in bloom, but of the fact that she did not remove her way of living when the visitors departed; she illustrated on Tuesdays and baked on Thursdays and milked on Saturdays with equal sincerity, not because anyone watched but because it was consonant with her temperament.
Temperament, my loves, cannot be sustained as theatre for long.
One may wear simplicity as linen for a season, one may caption spirituality in sepia tones, one may curate slow living between salon appointments and curated dinners, yet continuity has a way of revealing what is costume and what is constitution, for eventually the tone alters, the devotion thins, the aesthetic shifts with the wind, and the life rearranges itself back into its native rhythm.
And here is where my vulnerability unfurls most tenderly before you; when someone asks if I reenact, I feel, beneath my smile, a quiet ache that what has been my refuge might be mistaken for performance, that my orientation might be reduced to theatre, that the devotion of decades could be mistaken for trend participation, and perhaps that is why I bristle when I see the aesthetic worn lightly — because I fear being folded into the same misunderstanding.
I do not wish to be confused with costume.
I wish to be known for temperament.
There was a season when cottagecore swelled like a tide, and many rode it beautifully and briefly, and some were carried swiftly into visibility, and I remained upon the shore in the same apron I had always worn, neither amplified nor diminished, simply continuing, and if I am to confess another small and human truth, I have wondered in softer hours why the wave crowned others and passed me by, though I had been standing there long before it arrived.
Yet tides are dramatic, and shorelines endure.
I was not building a moment.
I was building a life.
And lives are slower.
So if something within me tightens when aesthetic devotion appears to toggle with popularity, it is not because I begrudge anyone her manicure or her modernity, but because I hold sacred the integration of image and embodiment, and I have learned through many trials that stability is not forged in applause but in repetition.
Perhaps what unsettles me most is not falseness in others but the fear of being mistaken for it myself.
And so I write this not to accuse, but to clarify my own heart before you, for I would rather be a woman of quiet continuity than a fleeting spectacle, rather rooted than radiant for a moment and gone the next, rather misunderstood in my steadfastness than celebrated for a costume I intend to remove.
If I am a Victorian mermaid, it is not because it photographs prettily, but because it soothes my nervous system, steadies my spirit, and aligns with the inner architecture of who I have always been.
And that, my dearest darlings, is not theatre.
It is home.
Most affably yours 'til my next enchanting swim, LR





